University of South Florida - click to return to home page
USF masthead right
College of Education Banner Image and Link to Home Page
COEDU MailChalk&WiremyUSF
   
Introduction
Section 1
Section 2  
Section 3a
Section 3b
Section 3c
Section 3d
Section 3e
Section 3f
Section 4
 
Introduction
Content
Summary
Glossary  
Review  
References
 

Positive Behavior Support

Why is the Child Behaving This Way?

The Process of Functional Behavior Assessment

child sleeping in class


Introduction & Overview

The purpose of this section is to provide an overview of functional behavior assessment (FBA), providing participants with an understanding of the process, its fit within the PBS model, and strategies for effective practice. Assessment strategies and best practices are discussed.

Content

printer icon
(Click here to print out the complete "Content" section.)

Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA)

The process of identifying the events in the environment that consistently precede (antecedents) and follow (consequences) challenging behavior.

(Neilsen & McEvoy, 2004)
(Click on the playhead > to learn more about Functional Behavior Assessment.)

 

The Role of FBA

  • A critical step in linking assessment to intervention
  • Recommended in the IDEA 1997 Regulations
  • Critically important for infants and toddlers since they have brief learning histories (Dunlap & Fox, 1996)
  • Helps discriminate between "can't do" and "won't do" types of problems
  • Gives parents and professionals confidence as to:
    1. why a behavior is occurring
    2. the conditions under which it occurs
    3. what specific interventions are necessary

Why Conduct an FBA?

  • provides a clear description of the context and conditions under which challenging behaviors are observed
  • identifies the purpose of the child's challenging behavior (i.e., the "why" question)
  • allows one to identify variables that predict the occurrence of challenging behavior
  • helps identify and expand the child's strengths
  • promotes the identification of specific interventions that match the identified purpose of the challenging behavior
  • interventions developed using FBA have resulted in meaningful reductions in challenging behavior
  • interventions developed using FBA can result in higher rates of engagement and can promote positive social interactions
  • helps parents and teachers "step back" -- by removing themselves from the situation, teachers and parents are better able to objectively observe the childs' behavior and understand what environmental factors contribute to a behavior's occurrence

Assumption

  • Critical Assumption:

    Challenging behavior serves a specific function or purpose
    (Neilsen & McEvoy, 2004).

  • The function is almost always in part communicative.

Behaviors have two general functions:

  • To get something (Obtain)
    • Example: A toddler consistently cries when his mother is talking on the telephone in order to obtain her attention.

  • To get out of something (Escape)
    • Example: A child tantrums during a math lesson to escape a difficult or non-preferred task.

Functions:

  • Several different types exist.
  • Challenging behavior can be maintained by either single OR multiple functions.

Possible Functions of Challenging Behavior

  • To obtain attention
    • Adults, peers

  • To obtain tangible
    • Object or activity

  • To obtain sensory/internal stimulation (i.e., automatic reinforcement)
    • Not directly observable, but may occur with occurrences of self-injurious behavior (e.g., pica, head banging) or stereotopy

  • To escape attention
    • Adults, peers

  • To escape a task
    • Non-preferred or too difficult

adult teaching children

Multiple Functions & Challenging Behavior

  • Extremely difficult to understand without FBA.
  • FBA helps identify primary and secondary functions.
  • May be determined at any time (e.g., long after the initial assessment).
  • Often require either a second opinion and/or consultation from a trained professional (e.g., behavior analyst).

Why are Multiple Functions Important?

In some instances, a child may demonstrate challenging behavior for one reason in one set of conditions, but use the exact same behavior in order for an entirely different reason.

(Click on the playhead > to hear an example.)

 

Methods & Procedures

NOTE:
As stated previously, this module is designed to be a helpful resource for professionals and professionals-in-training who:

  1. work with preschoolers, children, or adolescents who demonstrate challenging behavior;
  2.   and
  3. have already received coursework and/or applied training in basic classroom observation techniques.
It was developed with the intention of serving only as a supplement to other instructional materials that teach classroom observation techniques. For additional information about this subject matter, the interested reader is encouraged to consult additional references listed at the end of this section (e.g., Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 1987; O'Neill et al., 1997; Repp & Horner, 1999; Sulzer-Azaroff & Mayer, 1991).

Additional information is also available here.


Data Collection Systems & Samples

For detailed information click on the following link here, available courtesy of the Center for Evidence-Based Practice: Young Children with Challenging Behavior.

Indirect Data Collection System

  • Interviews
  • Record reviews
  • Behavior rating scales

Direct Data Collection System

  • Anecdotal behavior observation
  • Antecedent-behavior-consequence analysis
  • Systematic behavioral observations
  • Functional analysis

Indirect Methods

  • Interviews
    • Anecdotal
    • Causal discussion (e.g., face-to-face or telephone contact)
    • Least accurate
    • Semi-structured interviews
    • Functional Assessment Interview: Young Child
      (FAI-YC; CSEFWL, 2003; O'Neill et al., 1997)
    • Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers and Staff
      (FACTS; March et al., 2000)
    • Most accurate

  • Records reviews
    • Medical/developmental records (e.g., birth records, medications, immunizations, hearing and vision screenings)
    • Early Intervention/Early Steps records (e.g., Individualized Family Support Plans, test scores, therapist records)
    • Educational records (e.g., Individualized Education Plans, attendance records, report cards, test scores)
    • Other permanent products (e.g., preschool/daycare records)
    • Require permission to access/release of information

  • Behavior Rating Scales: Broad and Narrow Band

Broad-band:

Assesses multiple domains

(e.g., all five developmental domains -- motor, adaptive, social, academic, language; challenging behavior -- combining both internalizing and externalizing behaviors)

Narrow-band:

Assesses single domains

(e.g., a social skills rating scale or a rating scale measuring adaptive skills)

  • Can be used to determine the presence of challenging behavior across settings, or individuals
  • Vary in their degree of utility
  • Reflect perceptions of respondents
  • Examples: Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS; Durand & Crimmins, 1988); Skillstreaming Checklist (McGinnia & Goldstein, 1990); Temperament and Atypical Behavior Scale (TABS; Bagnato et al., 1999); Child Behavior Checklist 1 1/2 - 5 (CBCL; Achenbach, 2004)

 

Direct Methods

  • Anecdotal behavior observation
    • Informal notes takekn during/after observations (e.g., narrative recording or running record of events)
    • Least accurate

  • Scatter plots
    • Used to record data as they occur (i.e., individual events)
    • Used to assess patterns of occurrence across dates, settings, times of day, as well as to assess relevant setting events.
    • Frequently used in classroom settings
    • Easier for interventionists to accurately complete

  • Antecedent-behavior-consequence analysis (A-B-C analysis)
    • Looks at what happens immediately before and after a target behavior occurs
    • Should include consideratino of relevant setting events
    • Context cards can also be used to conduct A-B-C analyses (provides notation of antecedents, behaviors, and consequences)

  • Systematic behavioral observations
    • Event-based (recording each single event)
    • Interval-based (recording observations on an interval of time, such as every 15 seconds)
    • Duration-based (the amount of time that passes during a behavior's occurrence)
    • Entails observing a child relative to operational definitions within specific parameters (e.g., time, occurrence)
    • Training and practice prior to formal data collection is recommended
    • Most accurate

 

Target Variables (for all methods):

  • Frequency
  • Rate
  • Duration
  • Latency
  • Inter-response time (i.e., the time that passes between two responses)
  • Percentage of occurrence
  • Trials to criterion

 

Links to Files:

 

Functional Analysis

  • An experimental manipulation of antecedent and consequence variables
  • Includes a withdrawl condition for comparative purposes
  • Often used in analog research settings
  • Difficult to conduct with precision in applied settings
  • Requires careful consideration of ethics and safety
  • Although its limitations are many, functional analyses mostly clearly identify the variables maintaining behavior over time
(Click on the playhead > to learn more about functional analysis.)

 

Some Issues to Consider in Functional Analysis

  • What's worked with this child in the past? What has not?
  • What are the child's exceptions? What are the behaviors and skills we want to teach?
  • Some challenging behavior may have the same form, but serve multiple functions.
  • What's happening when the behavior is not occurring?
  • Some challenging behaviors may begin around one function (e.g., escape) and continue to serve another function (e.g., attention).
  • Ease of Data Collection
    • (Click on the playhead > to learn more about the ease of data collection.)

 

children playing in class

 

Applications of FBA Technology

  • Linking assessment to intervention
  • Designing effective interventions within natural environments relative to different:
    • Settings (e.g., home, daycare/preschool, community)
    • Routines (e.g., mealtime, bedtime)
    • Intervention agents (e.g., parents, teachers, siblings)
    • Developmental domains (e.g., communication, social, adaptive, academic, motor)

 

Functional Assessment-based Intervention

  • Comprehensive FBA allows one to conduct effective and efficient interventions by by linking assessment to intervention
  • Behavioral intervention conducted without FBA equates to guesswork or chance
  • Promotes "resistance to intervention"
    • (Click on the playhead > to learn more about resistance to intervention.)

 

Three General Strategies (Neilsen & McEvoy, 2004):

  • Altering the antecedents that predict challenging behavior
         (i.e., environmental modification)
  • Establishing or strengthening the response-reinforcer relationship
         (i.e., teaching through reinforcement)
  • Weakening the maintaining response-reinforcer relationship
         (i.e., extinction)

 

Assessing Sleep Difficulties:

FBA Application Examples:

  • Where the child sleeps
         (i.e., antecedent variables)
  • How much sleep the child normally gets at night
         (i.e., age-level anticipation)
  • Time the child is put to bed
         (i.e., delivery of bedtime SD)
  • What the child needs to fall asleep
         (i.e., favorite toy, blanket)
  • The time it takes for a child to fall asleep
         (i.e., latency of sleep onset)
  • If & when the child awakened during the night
  • How long it took the child to fall back asleep
         (i.e., latency/sleep onset)
  • Conseqences when child awakened
         (e.g., comforting, consolation)
  • Time of awakening
  • Frequency, duration, & time of day in which naps occurred
  • Changes or stressors in the home
         (i.e., setting events)

printer icon
(Click here to print, read, and highlight the Do's and Don'ts of Functional Assessment).

 

Tips to Remember:

  • The more clearly a behavior is defined, the easier it is to study and understand.
  • It is just as important to consider events that occurred earlier in the child's day as those that occurred immediately before the challenging behavior. This includes events such as breakfast, commute to school, amount of sleep the night before, etc.
  • Behavior depends on the context-the reason a child engages in a challenging behavior in one setting may be different in another.
  • One way to better understand why challenging behavior occurs is to identify the features of the child's environment that are present (e.g., people, activities, and objects) when the challenging behavior does not occur.
  • It is very important to identify the child's preferences - the people, objects, and activities the child likes - so that they may be incorporated into future interventions.
  • Don't forget to learn about the child's strengths. The more the child's strengths are identified and incorporated into interventions, the more likely the chance of success.
  • As always, do not forget to both obtain consent from the child's parent/legal guardian prior to conducting the assessment, and also be sure to follow pertinent laws regarding confidentiality and protected health information (HIPAA).

 

printer icon
(Click here to print out information on Standards of Practice --
   Behavior Analyst Certification Board -- www.BACB.com)

 

Summary

The purpose of this section was to provide an overview of functional behavior assessment (FBA), and provide participants with an understanding of the process, its fit within the PBS model, the possible functions of challenging behavior, and strategies for effective practice. Specific functional assessment concepts and data collection procedures were presented (e.g., functional analysis, types of observations, types of indirect data collection methods). Assessment strategies and best practices were discussed.

Glossary (Links to Definitions)


Review Questions

Multiple Choice

  1. "The process of identifying the events in the environment that consistently precede (antecedents) and follow (consequences) challenging behavior."

    A. Functional analysis
    B. Positive behavior support
    C. Functional behavior assessment
    D. Operational definition


  2. The purposes of a functional behavior assessment are to:

    A. Define the events in the environment that predictably maintain challenging behavior (via hypothesis statements).

    B. Gain information that will improve the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions.

    C. To answer the "why" question.

    D. All of the above


  3. Which is the least likely example of a behavior function?

    A. Escape non-preferred or difficult tasks
    B. Obtain attention from adults or peers
    C. Obtain/escape internal stimulation
    D. Escape preferred tasks


  4. True/False: Although most behaviors serve as a form of communication, severe self-injurious behaviors may not occur for an entirely different purpose (e.g., to obtain automatic reinforcement, reduce heart rate).

    A. True
    B. False


  5. Support plans developed based upon functional behavior assessment findings are:

    A. More effective than support plans that do not include FBAs.
    B. Less effective than support plans that do not include FBAs.
    C. Equally effective as support plans that do not include FBAs.
    D. Neither type of support plan is particularly effective.


  6. True/False: Challenging behaviors with multiple functions extremely difficult to understand without FBA and often require either a second opinion and/or consultation from a trained professional (e.g., behavior analyst).

    A. True
    B. False


  7. Which is not an example of a direct form of data collection?

    A. Antecedent-behavior-consequence analyses
    B. Systematic behavioral observations
    C. Records reviews
    D. Functional analyses


  8. Which is not an example of a record typically reviewed during a functional behavior assessment for a child with challenging behavior?

    A. Medical/developmental records (e.g., birth records, medications, immunizations, hearing and vision screenings)
    B. Early Intervention/Early Steps records (e.g., Individualized Family Support Plans, test scores, therapist reports)
    C. Educational records (e.g., Individualized Educational Plans, attendance records, report cards, test scores)
    D. None of the above-they're all applicable.


  9. Scatter plots are used to:

    A. Look at what happens immediately before and after a target behavior occurs.
    B. Assess patterns of occurrence across dates, settings, and times of day.
    C. Measure the duration (i.e., the amount of time that passes during a behavior's occurrence).
    D. Keep a running record of the events that one observes over a brief period of time.


  10. Which of the following statements does not apply to functional analyses?

    A. An experimental manipulation of antecedent and consequence variables.

    B. Although its limitations are many, functional analyses mostly clearly identify the variables maintaining behavior over time.

    C. In other circumstances, however, removal of an intervention could cause the likelihood of a personal injury (e.g., systematically manipulating antecedent and consequence variables associated with a child's self-injury may cause significant injury).

    D. Functional analyses are quick, low-risk procedures with minimal risk to children that can be easily conducted by novice professionals with minimal background training in behavior analysis.



References & Resources

Behavior Analysis Certification Board   website

Carr, E.G., Levin, L., McConnachie, G., Carlson, J.I., Kemp, D.C., & Smith, C.E. (1994). Communication-based interventions for problem behavior: A user's guide for producing behavior change. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

Center for Evidence-Based Practice: Young Children with Challenging Behavior. http://challengingbehavior.org

Center for the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning http://csefel.uiuc.edu/

Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied Behavior Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Hieneman, M., Nolan, M., Presley, J., De Turo, L., Roberson, W., & Dunlap, G. (1999). Facilitator's guide: Positive behavioral support. Positive Behavioral Support Project, Florida Department of Education.

O'Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Online Academy (Sponsored by the University of Kansas and the Office of Special Education Programs) http://onlineacademy.org

OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. http://www.pbis.org

Repp, A.C. & Horner, R.H. (Eds.) (1999). Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support. Pacific Grove: CA: Brooks/Cole.

Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1991). Behavior analysis for lasting change. Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Intro Section 1 Section 2 Section 3a Section 3b (next page) Section 3e Section 3f

| Giving to the COEDU | Partnerships | Student Academic Services | College Council | Accreditation | Contact Us |
tan bar
green bar
spacer
College of Education, EDU162, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620-5650 -- (813) 974-3400
spacer
Copyright © 2004-06
Search the USF Web site Site Map USF home page Links for Prospective Students Links for Our Students Links for Visitors Links for Faculty & Staff Links for Alumni & Parents USF Campuses Links for Business & Community