Positive Behavior Support
Why is the Child Behaving This Way?
The Process of Functional Behavior Assessment
Introduction & Overview
The
purpose of this section is to provide an overview of functional
behavior assessment (FBA), providing participants with an understanding
of the process, its fit within the PBS model, and strategies
for effective practice. Assessment strategies and best practices
are discussed.
Content
(Click here to print out the complete "Content" section.)
Functional Behavior Assessment (FBA)
The process of identifying the events in the environment that consistently precede (antecedents) and follow (consequences) challenging behavior.
(Neilsen & McEvoy, 2004)
(Click on the playhead > to learn more about Functional Behavior Assessment.)
The Role of FBA
A critical step in linking assessment to intervention
Recommended in the IDEA 1997 Regulations
Critically important for infants and toddlers since they have brief learning histories (Dunlap & Fox, 1996)
Helps discriminate between "can't do" and "won't do" types of problems
Gives parents and professionals confidence as to:
why a behavior is occurring
the conditions under which it occurs
what specific interventions are necessary
Why Conduct an FBA?
provides a clear description of the context and conditions under which challenging behaviors are observed
identifies the purpose of the child's challenging behavior (i.e., the "why" question)
allows one to identify variables that predict the occurrence of challenging behavior
helps identify and expand the child's strengths
promotes the identification of specific interventions that match the identified purpose of the challenging behavior
interventions developed using FBA have resulted in meaningful reductions in challenging behavior
interventions developed using FBA can result in higher rates of engagement and can promote positive social interactions
helps parents and teachers "step back" -- by removing themselves from the situation, teachers and parents are better able to objectively
observe the childs' behavior and understand what environmental factors contribute to a behavior's occurrence
Assumption
Behaviors have two general functions:
To get something (Obtain)
Example : A toddler consistently cries when his mother is talking on the telephone in order to obtain her attention.
To get out of something (Escape)
Example : A child tantrums during a math lesson to escape a difficult or non-preferred task.
Functions:
Several different types exist.
Challenging behavior can be maintained by either single OR multiple functions.
Possible Functions of Challenging Behavior
To obtain attention
To obtain tangible
To obtain sensory/internal stimulation (i.e., automatic reinforcement)
Not directly observable, but may occur with occurrences of self-injurious behavior (e.g., pica, head banging) or stereotopy
To escape attention
To escape a task
Non-preferred or too difficult
Multiple Functions & Challenging Behavior
Extremely difficult to understand without FBA.
FBA helps identify primary and secondary functions.
May be determined at any time (e.g., long after the initial assessment).
Often require either a second opinion and/or consultation from a trained professional (e.g., behavior analyst).
Why are Multiple Functions Important?
In some instances, a child may demonstrate challenging behavior
for one reason in one set of conditions, but use the exact same behavior in order for an
entirely different reason.
(Click on the playhead > to hear an example.)
Methods & Procedures
NOTE : As stated previously,
this module is designed to be a helpful resource for professionals and professionals-in-training who:
work with preschoolers, children, or adolescents who demonstrate challenging behavior;
and
have already received coursework and/or applied training in basic classroom observation techniques.
It was developed with the intention of serving only as a supplement to other instructional materials that teach classroom
observation techniques. For additional information about this subject matter, the interested reader is encouraged to consult
additional references listed at the end of this section (e.g., Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 1987; O'Neill et al., 1997; Repp & Horner, 1999; Sulzer-Azaroff & Mayer, 1991).
Additional information is also available here .
Data Collection Systems & Samples
For
detailed information click on the following link here ,
available courtesy of the Center for Evidence-Based Practice:
Young Children with Challenging Behavior.
Indirect Data Collection System
Interviews
Record reviews
Behavior rating scales
Direct Data Collection System
Anecdotal behavior observation
Antecedent-behavior-consequence analysis
Systematic behavioral observations
Functional analysis
Indirect Methods
Interviews
Causal discussion (e.g., face-to-face or telephone contact)
Semi-structured interviews
Functional Assessment Interview: Young Child (FAI-YC; CSEFWL, 2003; O'Neill et al., 1997)
Functional Assessment Checklist for Teachers and Staff (FACTS; March et al., 2000)
Records reviews
Medical/developmental records (e.g., birth records, medications, immunizations, hearing and vision screenings)
Early Intervention/Early Steps records (e.g., Individualized Family Support Plans, test scores, therapist records)
Educational records (e.g., Individualized Education Plans, attendance records, report cards, test scores)
Other permanent products (e.g., preschool/daycare records)
Require permission to access/release of information
Behavior Rating Scales : Broad and Narrow Band
Broad-band :
Assesses multiple domains (e.g., all five developmental domains -- motor, adaptive, social, academic, language;
challenging behavior -- combining both internalizing and externalizing behaviors)
Narrow-band :
Assesses single domains (e.g., a social skills rating
scale or a rating scale measuring adaptive skills)
Can be used to determine the presence of challenging behavior across settings, or individuals
Vary in their degree of utility
Reflect perceptions of respondents
Examples: Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS; Durand & Crimmins, 1988); Skillstreaming Checklist (McGinnia & Goldstein, 1990);
Temperament and Atypical Behavior Scale (TABS; Bagnato et al., 1999); Child Behavior Checklist 1 1/2 - 5 (CBCL; Achenbach, 2004)
Direct Methods
Anecdotal behavior observation
Informal notes takekn during/after observations (e.g., narrative recording or running record of events)
Scatter plots
Used to record data as they occur (i.e., individual events)
Used to assess patterns of occurrence across dates, settings, times of day, as well as to assess relevant setting events .
Frequently used in classroom settings
Easier for interventionists to accurately complete
Antecedent-behavior-consequence analysis (A-B-C analysis)
Looks at what happens immediately before and after a target behavior occurs
Should include consideratino of relevant setting events
Context cards can also be used to conduct A-B-C analyses (provides notation of antecedents, behaviors, and consequences)
Systematic behavioral observations
Event-based (recording each single event)
Interval-based (recording observations on an interval of time, such as every 15 seconds)
Duration-based (the amount of time that passes during a behavior's occurrence)
Entails observing a child relative to operational definitions within specific parameters (e.g., time, occurrence)
Training and practice prior to formal data collection is recommended
Target Variables (for all methods):
Frequency
Rate
Duration
Latency
Inter-response time (i.e., the time that passes between two responses)
Percentage of occurrence
Trials to criterion
Links to Files :
Functional Analysis
An experimental manipulation of antecedent and consequence variables
Includes a withdrawl condition for comparative purposes
Often used in analog research settings
Difficult to conduct with precision in applied settings
Requires careful consideration of ethics and safety
Although its limitations are many, functional analyses mostly clearly identify the variables maintaining behavior over time
(Click on the playhead > to learn more about functional analysis.)
Some Issues to Consider in Functional Analysis
What's worked with this child in the past? What has not?
What are the child's exceptions? What are the behaviors and skills we want to teach?
Some challenging behavior may have the same form, but serve multiple functions.
What's happening when the behavior is not occurring?
Some challenging behaviors may begin around one function (e.g., escape) and continue to serve another function (e.g., attention).
Ease of Data Collection
Applications of FBA Technology
Linking assessment to intervention
Designing effective interventions within natural environments relative to different:
Settings (e.g., home, daycare/preschool, community)
Routines (e.g., mealtime, bedtime)
Intervention agents (e.g., parents, teachers, siblings)
Developmental domains (e.g., communication, social, adaptive, academic, motor)
Functional Assessment-based Intervention
Comprehensive FBA allows one to conduct effective and efficient interventions
by by linking assessment to intervention
Behavioral intervention conducted without FBA equates to guesswork or chance
Promotes "resistance to intervention"
Three General Strategies (Neilsen & McEvoy, 2004):
Altering the antecedents that predict challenging behavior (i.e., environmental modification)
Establishing or strengthening the response-reinforcer relationship (i.e., teaching through reinforcement)
Weakening the maintaining response-reinforcer relationship (i.e., extinction)
Assessing Sleep Difficulties:
FBA Application Examples:
Where the child sleeps (i.e., antecedent variables)
How much sleep the child normally gets at night (i.e., age-level anticipation)
Time the child is put to bed (i.e., delivery of bedtime SD)
What the child needs to fall asleep (i.e., favorite toy, blanket)
The time it takes for a child to fall asleep (i.e., latency of sleep onset)
If & when the child awakened during the night
How long it took the child to fall back asleep (i.e., latency/sleep onset)
Conseqences when child awakened (e.g., comforting, consolation)
Time of awakening
Frequency, duration, & time of day in which naps occurred
Changes or stressors in the home (i.e., setting events)
(Click here to print, read, and highlight the Do's and Don'ts of Functional Assessment).
Tips to Remember:
The more clearly a behavior is defined, the easier it is to study and understand.
It is just as important to consider events that occurred earlier in the child's day as those that occurred immediately before the challenging behavior. This includes events such as breakfast, commute to school, amount of sleep the night before, etc.
Behavior depends on the context-the reason a child engages in a challenging behavior in one setting may be different in another.
One way to better understand why challenging behavior occurs is to identify the features of the child's environment that are present (e.g., people, activities, and objects) when the challenging behavior does not occur.
It is very important to identify the child's preferences - the people, objects, and activities the child likes - so that they may be incorporated into future interventions.
Don't forget to learn about the child's strengths. The more the child's strengths are identified and incorporated into interventions, the more likely the chance of success.
As always, do not forget to both obtain consent from the child's parent/legal guardian prior to conducting the assessment, and also be sure to follow pertinent laws regarding confidentiality and protected health information (HIPAA).
(Click here to print out information
on Standards of Practice -- Behavior Analyst Certification Board
-- www.BACB.com)
Summary
The purpose of this section was to provide an overview of functional behavior assessment (FBA), and provide
participants with an understanding of the process, its fit within the PBS model, the possible functions of
challenging behavior, and strategies for effective practice. Specific functional assessment concepts and data
collection procedures were presented (e.g., functional analysis, types of observations, types of indirect data
collection methods). Assessment strategies and best practices were discussed.
Glossary (Links to Definitions)
Review Questions
Multiple Choice
"The process of identifying the events in the environment that consistently precede (antecedents) and follow (consequences) challenging behavior."
A. Functional analysis
B. Positive behavior support
C. Functional behavior assessment
D. Operational definition
The purposes of a functional behavior assessment are to:
A. Define the events in the environment that predictably maintain challenging behavior (via hypothesis statements).
B. Gain information that will improve the effectiveness and efficiency of interventions.
C. To answer the "why" question.
D. All of the above
Which is the least likely example of a behavior function?
A. Escape non-preferred or difficult tasks
B. Obtain attention from adults or peers
C. Obtain/escape internal stimulation
D. Escape preferred tasks
True/False: Although most behaviors serve as a form of communication, severe self-injurious behaviors may not occur for an entirely different purpose (e.g., to obtain automatic reinforcement, reduce heart rate).
A. True
B. False
Support plans developed based upon functional behavior assessment findings are:
A. More effective than support plans that do not include FBAs.
B. Less effective than support plans that do not include FBAs.
C. Equally effective as support plans that do not include FBAs.
D. Neither type of support plan is particularly effective.
True/False: Challenging behaviors with multiple functions extremely difficult to understand without FBA and often require either a second opinion and/or consultation from a trained professional (e.g., behavior analyst).
A. True
B. False
Which is not an example of a direct form of data collection?
A. Antecedent-behavior-consequence analyses
B. Systematic behavioral observations
C. Records reviews
D. Functional analyses
Which is not an example of a record typically reviewed during a functional behavior assessment for a child with challenging behavior?
A. Medical/developmental records (e.g., birth records, medications, immunizations, hearing and vision screenings)
B. Early Intervention/Early Steps records (e.g., Individualized Family Support Plans, test scores, therapist reports)
C. Educational records (e.g., Individualized Educational Plans, attendance records, report cards, test scores)
D. None of the above-they're all applicable.
Scatter plots are used to:
A. Look at what happens immediately before and after a target behavior occurs.
B. Assess patterns of occurrence across dates, settings, and times of day.
C. Measure the duration (i.e., the amount of time that passes during a behavior's occurrence).
D. Keep a running record of the events that one observes over a brief period of time.
Which of the following statements does not apply to functional analyses?
A. An experimental manipulation of antecedent and consequence variables.
B. Although its limitations are many, functional analyses mostly clearly identify the variables maintaining behavior over time.
C. In other circumstances, however, removal of an intervention could cause the likelihood of a personal injury (e.g., systematically manipulating antecedent and consequence variables associated with a child's self-injury may cause significant injury).
D. Functional analyses are quick, low-risk procedures with minimal risk to children that can be easily conducted by novice professionals with minimal background training in behavior analysis.
References & Resources
Behavior Analysis Certification Board website
Carr, E.G., Levin, L., McConnachie, G., Carlson, J.I., Kemp, D.C., & Smith, C.E. (1994). Communication-based interventions for problem behavior: A user's guide for producing behavior change . Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Center for Evidence-Based Practice: Young Children with Challenging Behavior. http://challengingbehavior.org
Center for the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning http://csefel.uiuc.edu/
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987). Applied Behavior Analysis . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Hieneman, M., Nolan, M., Presley, J., De Turo, L., Roberson, W., & Dunlap, G. (1999). Facilitator's guide: Positive behavioral support . Positive Behavioral Support Project, Florida Department of Education.
O'Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Sprague, J. R., Storey, K., & Newton, J. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook . Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Online Academy (Sponsored by the University of Kansas and the Office of Special Education Programs) http://onlineacademy.org
OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. http://www.pbis.org
Repp, A.C. & Horner, R.H. (Eds.) (1999). Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support . Pacific Grove: CA: Brooks/Cole.
Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1991). Behavior analysis for lasting change . Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.